Factors that influence the presence of diabetes in patients at the Víctor Ramos Guardia hospital – 2021
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study was conducted with patients with diabetes, an indicator of health in developing nations based on biological, social and cultural factors, in order to understand the determinants of the presence of diabetes. Factors significantly associated with diabetes include biological aspects, such as age (p = 0.006 < 0.01) and weight (p = 0.025 < 0.05); cultural factors, such as educational level (p = 0.017 < 0.05) and dependency (p < 0.05); and socioeconomic factors, highlighting marital status (p = 0.033 < 0.05) and income (p = 0.011 < 0.05). The results also indicate significant associations between diabetes and variables such as age (p = 0.006), weight (p = 0.025), educational level (p = 0.017), marital status (p = 0.033), income (p = 0.011) and dependency (p < 0.05). The probability of the patient with diabetes using the binary logistic regression model was: z = 2.618 + 1.00X1 + 1.327X2 + 2.572X3 + 1.639X4 1.034X5 + 2.800X6. The predictive model obtained was validated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow and Desviance tests, demonstrating its adequacy by not presenting significant discrepancies between the observed data and the predictions. With an optimal cut-off point of 0.3125, a correct classification rate of 77.7% was achieved, with a specificity of 78.4% and a sensitivity of 83.5%. The surface under the ROC curve (0.8524; 95% CI: 0.8181-0.9067) reflects an excellent discriminative capacity. These findings highlight the importance of addressing the identified risk factors to improve diabetes prevention and control strategies in vulnerable populations.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ahmed, S. F., McDermott, K. C., Burge, W. K., Ahmed, I. I. K., Varma, D. K., Liao, Y. J., Crandall, A. S., & Khaderi, S. K. R. (2018). Visual function, digital behavior and the vision performance index. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 12, 2553-2561. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S187131
Alaofè, H., Hounkpatin, W. A., Djrolo, F., Ehiri, J., & Rosales, C. (2021). Knowledge, attitude, practice and associated factors among patients with type 2 diabetes in Cotonou, Southern Benin. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 339. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10289-8
http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1561-29532016000200002&lng=es&tlng=es
Illescas, Y. (2017). Factores de riesgo para prevenir la diabetes mellitus tipo II en pacientes ambulatorios atendidos en el Hospital Regional de Ica, marzo 2017 [Tesis de licenciatura, Universidad Alas Peruanas]. https://repositorio.uap.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12990/6561/Tesis_Factores_Riesgo_Prevenir_Diabetes_Mellitus.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (2020). El 39,9% de peruanos de 15 y más años de edad tiene al menos una comorbilidad. https://m.inei.gob.pe/prensa/noticias/el-399-de-peruanos-de-15-y-mas-anos-de-edad-tiene-al-menos-una-comorbilidad-12903/
International Diabetes Federation (2021). IDF Diabetes Atlas (10th ed). https://www.diabetesatlas.org
Leiva, A. M., Martínez, M. A., Petermann, F., Garrido-Méndez, A., Poblete-Valderrama, F., Díaz-Martínez, X., & Celis-Morales, C. (2018). Factores asociados al desarrollo de diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en Chile. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 35(2), 400-407. https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.1434
Llorente Columbié, Y., Miguel-Soca, P. E., Rivas Vázquez, D., & Borrego Chi, Y. (2016). Factores de riesgo asociados con la aparición de diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en personas adultas. Revista Cubana de Endocrinología, 27(2).
Schisler, J. C., Lang, C. H, Willis, M. (2016). Endocrinology of the Heart in Health and Disease. (2016). https://shop.elsevier.com/books/endocrinology-of-the-heart-in-health-and-disease/schisler/978-0-12-803111-7
Suárez Lindao, B., & Maggi Garcés, B. (2020). Escala de Likert en el nivel de conocimiento de Diabetes Tipo 2 en la provincia de Santa Elena. Revista Ciencias Pedagógicas e Innovación, 8(1), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.26423/rcpi.v8i1.346